and business are exactly the same.
Lying and bluffing are acceptable in both so
what if someone thinks poker and business are exactly the same. Lying and bluffing are acceptable in both so
there are no ethical issues in either case.
How would Kant address the poker/business question? Would he distinguish between poker and business? Kant would say that you cannot make exceptions to your moral obligations, even for a good cause. Is lying/deception ever ok according to Kant?