The decision to drop the atom bomb on Japan

However, recent studiesi related to this issue have indicated conflicting and contrasting results involving exaggeration of the number of lives saved by such decision, and the unreal reason and factor of dropping the bomb on two cities of Japan. For such purpose, this paper will specifically attempt to identify and compare arguments of both sides of this decision that will enable the reader to acquire a more critical position on the issue. Analysis of the literatureii has specified that Japan was near to surrender its forces in front of the United States. however, it was essential for the US to abandon the Japanese emperor in that case, and such step was unacceptable for the President Truman and the US government.
In addition, expertsiii have argued that dropping of the bomb on Japan was an indirect indication of power and supremacy of the US government in front of the Soviet Union, essential for the establishment of an influential and commanding position after the war. Works of historians and experts in recent years have indicated that abovementioned reason of the President Truman related to saving thousands of American soldiers was not real. In addition, another reason of the President that the decision forced Japan to surrender was false as well.
It is now evident from various sourcesiv that the decision to drop the atom bomb on Japan was a US or more specifically, President Truman’s way of threatening Soviet Union on the stage of war, and reasons such as quick finish of the war, saving thousands of American soldiers were just tools of hiding the real factor. However, before going against this decision, it is essential to look at the arguments that justified the decision of dropping the bomb. In this regard, sources have indicated that Japan played a very significant role during the war and resisted obsessively and passionately with its limited resources, and the Japanese government was preparing every