Drones for Domestic Video Surveillance

Drones are easy and are expected to revolutionize security surveillance as well as being considered essential asset in future despite privacy concerns and other abuses.
People of different political ideologies have raised debate regarding the use of drone with opponents complaining of infringement of fundamental privacy (Yanklowitz Web) interests and right to associate with others freely while proponents emphasize on potential benefits such as protecting public safety (Locke Web). Thompson asserts that issues of security and interests have always been triggered by arrival of surveillance technology in the past since law enforcers can now see through walls or track one’s movement from the sky (7). It is therefore apparent that many people question the proper balance between the necessity of the government to keep people safe and the privacy needs of the public even though the public support drone usage in some circumstances and less enthusiastic about using them as part of routine law enforcement.
It is therefore undeniable that drones have limited abilities such as failure to communicate with civilians for more detailed intelligence and the fact that they cannot go from door to door. Moreover, some drones are lethal and can therefore not be used for surveillance and the public feel paranoid and feel like the government watches them. Yanklowitz argues that privacy concerns are the main challenges to domestic use of drones because continuous surveillance may torture, shame and even make one loss dignity (Web). Drones let the government spy on the public at home in various circumstances such as while taking showers or doing some sensitive things that may require some form of privacy hence depriving rights of the public and lowering their dignity.
Thompson explains that home plays an integral role in American life and is accorded the greatest fourth amendment protection by ensuring that the right of